The Five-Paragraph Theme
Publication: The Quarterly, Vol. 24, No. 3
Date: Summer 2002
Summary: After teaching the five-paragraph essay early in her career, Glenda Moss now describes how it locks students into thinking it is the only way to write.
Early in her teaching career, Glenda Moss actively taught the five-paragraph essay. Only later did she consider what had become a concern among educators: that overemphasis on the five-paragraph theme had locked students into thinking it was the only way to write. Now convinced, Moss examines her belief that focusing on the five-paragraph essay underprepares students for college. Further, she adds her voice to the cry of many educators—that students need writing connections across the curriculum.
I did not always believe that the five-paragraph theme, as a standard, underprepared students for college. I did not make the connection when my own son failed freshman English at the local junior college in our East Texas city. I was pleased that he registered to repeat the course with the same teacher. While I personally felt disappointed with the teacher for "failing my son," who had "mastered" the skills tested by state standards in Texas and scored high enough on the college entrance exams to be exempted from the remedial English course, I believed my son's respect for and belief that his college English teacher could "teach him how to write" would result in a much higher level of success than he had experienced in high school. In retrospect, I was right. This past December, my son completed a master's thesis at the University of Houston.
It was not until he was in graduate school, and I was working on a doctorate, that I heard a freshman English teacher at Stephen F. Austin State University express concern that, since students have been "drilled" on the five-paragraph theme for the state test of academic skills, they were locked into only one way of writing an essay. I now remembered how, when students arrived in my seventh grade classroom, they had already had it ingrained in them that for the state test they were to write five paragraphs: an introduction, three body paragraphs, and a conclusion. Each body paragraph was to have an opening sentence and at least two details to support the opening sentence. Part of our job as seventh grade teachers was to make sure the students could write descriptive, instructive, comparative, and persuasive essays. Following instructional material provided to us, they wrote the essays that generally ended up as five-paragraph themes.
The five paragraph theme was the accepted standard, but whose standard was it? The prompts on the Texas Assessment of Academic Skills (TAAS) never referred to the "five-paragraph theme" as a standard. The students were not instructed by the test directions to write a "five-paragraph essay." I never once referred to the "five-paragraph theme" in my teaching. As a middle school language arts teacher for ten years in Texas, I came to believe in practice that this was the writing standard in Texas as we were given models of rubric scoring to evaluate our students' essays. These rubrics resulted in teachers preparing students to write five-paragraph themes.
While I required my seventh-, and later, eighth-graders to complete four research projects during the school year, most of the year was spent writing five-paragraph themes. This had become the norm for preparing students for success on the TAAS, the test that supposedly promoted higher-order thinking and held teachers accountable for student learning. For the most part, language arts teachers were successful within this accountability system as demonstrated by test scores, yet the number of students, like my own son, who were not prepared for college writing raised a doubt about the focus on five-paragraph themes.
We began with the best of intentions, focusing on the writing process—brainstorming, drafting, responding and revising, editing, and publishing. I cannot tell you when it happened that the process became a formula resulting in five-paragraph themes, but I believe it was the scoring rubric of the standardized test and pressure to teach our students how to be successful based on that rubric that resulted in formula writing. Students' opening and closing sentences began to appear as standardized. If the prompt read, "compare and contrast life in a rural community with life in an urban community," our students knew to begin the essay with a topic sentence something like this, "It is not hard to compare and contrast life in a rural community with life in an urban community." Or they might begin by stating, "Life in a rural community and life in an urban area are alike and different in several ways." Sometimes we would give our students ten prompts and have them write opening and closing sentences for each of them.
We also instructed our students on the importance of using transition words to maintain a cohesive flow between their ideas, examples, details, or reasons. Transition words were to indicate shifts to new paragraphs and were limited to a small word bank of transition words first, next, then, before, finally, similarly, and a handful of others. We meant well when we had weak writing students memorize transition words and introductory and closing sentences to match with particular writing prompts.
Prepositions took on new currency when the picture prompt was introduced. Students were presented a picture and asked to describe the scene. They could begin anywhere but were required to trace the picture in words by moving from top to bottom, left to right, right to left, or background to foreground—all in a multiparagraph theme. In front of, behind, to the right of, across from, in the distance, and near the right-hand corner were common tools students used to plow through the picture prompt.
The model writing norm, whether descriptive, instructive, classificatory, or persuasive, generally included an introductory paragraph, three paragraphs for the body, and a closing paragraph. Students were instructed to tell what they were going to write about, write about it, and then tell what they wrote about. While this is a standard that I remember being modeled in the fifties and sixties when I was an elementary and secondary student, it was only one model—the five-paragraph theme. In the educational reform of the nineties, one model became the only writing model for Texas students.
In Texas, teachers proudly boasted a high success rate when nearly every student could write a five-paragraph theme to any descriptive, how-to, compare and contrast, or persuasive prompt. Sometimes, we could even figure out the pattern and guess which mode would be tested in a given year. In the elementary grades, the students were given a picture to describe. In the sixth grade, students generally had to give the steps for how to do something. The prompts never invited any analysis of this process, so the resulting writing was usually a series of directions rather than an essay. Typical how-to prompts might read: "Think about your favorite game to play and explain in detail for a friend how to play the game," or "Your mom has given you permission to make your favorite after-school snack. Tell what your favorite after-school snack is and give detailed instructions on how to prepare it," or "Explain for your younger sibling how to gift wrap a present. Give details for all the steps needed to wrap the gift."
Seventh-graders generally were given classificatory prompts. Among the practice prompts that I gave my students was: "Your school is considering a dress code for next fall. Think about the good things and bad things about school dress codes. Write an essay for your teacher in which you explain the good things and bad things about dress codes." This prompt could then be changed to demonstrate for students the difference between classificatory and persuasive. Students could be prompted to write a persuasive letter to the local school board. The prompt might read: "Your school district is considering school uniforms. In a letter to the school board, take a position for or against school uniforms and give reasons to support your position." Once, I even hit the topic a few weeks before the test. My students thought I was a great teacher. Little did they realize that passing the TAAS would not guarantee them success in college, where writing standards included multiple models of writing to communicate critical thinking, something that does not seem to result from standardized testing that standardizes teaching practices.
It was a complex dilemma that I struggled with as a teacher. While I received praise from my school and district for my success rate among "at-risk" students, I kept asking myself why. Now, as I analyze my ten years of teaching under the TAAS testing system, I think it is accurate to say that the test prepared my students to write a five-paragraph theme, thus raising the level of education for some students, who had been tracked in special education and below-level classes, but it fell short of preparing students to write in multiple genres as expected in college. It is embarrassing as I reflect on some of the middle school teaching practices I used to motivate my students to successfully write for TAAS. In the week before the TAAS test when my students were working on compositions, we might have a dialogue similar to the following:
Students would complain, "These are boring topics."
I would reply, "I know. I am giving you boring topics these last two weeks before the state test because you will probably have a boring topic then, too. I know I created fun situations earlier in the year for you to write about. The camping trip behind the school, the food festival in the classroom, Mrs. Perkins' demonstration of the Inkle loom, and comparing and contrasting the two cars that Mr. Cagle brought were all fun. When you take the state test, you will probably be given a boring topic. If so, we need to practice writing terrific compositions even if we have a boring topic."
"Does everyone understand that on the state test you're totally on your own? You have to use all the skills you have learned to bring a boring topic to life."
Such instruction resulted in students disciplining themselves to write for the TAAS ritual.
I now have a clearer understanding of why my students and I agreed that my prompts were "fun" and the state prompts were "boring." My prompts emerged from the experience and concerns of my students. They knew all about Mr. Cagle's cars. They may never have given a thought to the subject of school uniforms before the day they confronted the topic on the TAAS test. And not only were they expected to write with intelligence on a subject about which they may have had little knowledge and less interest, they were required to accomplish this within the straight jacket of a five-paragraph format.
My frustration with teaching in a system that required me to participate in teaching to low standards ended in my resignation four years ago. That was following a school year in which I was not allowed to attend two professional conferences that I had been attending annually for at least five years. The message I understood was that I was needed in the classroom to prepare my students for TAAS. Professional development through attending conferences apparently was not perceived to contribute to that end. Innovation was no longer valued unless it resulted in success on TAAS.
Later, I realized that devaluing professional development had resulted in the devaluation of complex writing and critical thinking. Increasingly, I have come to understand the long-range negative effect on our students when the five-paragraph theme is the only standard. I now regret that I spent more time helping them to write to pass the TAAS than I did on helping my students to make the connection between writing skills as tools to express their thoughts, values, and beliefs.
College and university teachers in Texas—such as my son's instructor—have a right to pass judgment on the quality of writing instruction as evidenced in their freshmen's ability. But I wonder how long it will be until they, too, find themselves teaching to the five-paragraph theme. It was painful for me to watch university professors at various departments at Stephen F. Austin State University, where I was a doctoral research assistant, adapt to the impact of the standards movement as it was having its institutional effect on curriculum and teaching. I could see happening at the university level what had happened eight years earlier in the public schools. The examination for the Certification of Educators in Texas (ExCET), an accountability test for teachers in Texas, was shaping capstone courses into test-review courses, just as the TAAS had shaped writing within the five-paragraph theme.
Professors and teachers must work toward raising writing standards across the curriculum. As an educator of teachers, I now make reading, writing, and dialoguing central to the learning process in my classes. While I expect my preservice teachers to state the purpose of their synthesis papers, critically analyze, and synthesize educational research, I have to resist my students' initial tendency to expect me to give them a formula for controlled writing success. My expectation that my preservice teachers will be able to think critically and express their thoughts clearly goes beyond the minimal standards of a five-paragraph theme.
Will this make a difference? I hope so, but I'm not sure it will. Only this week, I sat in on an inservice for the English teachers at one of the local high schools. The principal is genuinely concerned about raising the Indiana State Test of Educational Progress (ISTEP) language scores for the school just like my Texas principal had been concerned about raising student scores on the TAAS. The principal believes that the test will change how teachers teach, and I agree. My concern is that this change will result in formula writing and five-paragraph themes. I am afraid that what Texas began will sweep the nation before the public demands what educators already know—students need writing connections across the curriculum and in multiple genres.
About the Author Glenda Moss is an assistant professor in the School of Education at Indiana University–Purdue University Fort Wayne. She instructs secondary preservice teachers and is currently a participant in the Indiana Writing Project Invitational Summer Institute.
Download "The Five-Paragraph Theme"
Related Resource Topics
Making Your Work Brilliant With Argumentative Essay Rubric
There are certain types of essay rubrics. They are called to help with the assessment of different kinds of essays. A persuasive essay rubric will analyse the general voice of the work and decide whether your claim is convincing enough. At the same time, an argumentative essay rubric is expected to evaluate the quality of the argumentation and the way the author integrates facts into the text. It is all about how you defend the main thesis. Be accurate and consistent as you present the information. Clear logical conclusions are exactly what such type of an essay implies.
As a student, you probably come across a rubric for essay almost every time you submit a new essay, sometimes even without knowing. Most of the works are usually assessed on the basis of an essay grading rubric which is comprised of a number of criteria. For instance, the clarity of idea, the depth of analysis and other features may be estimated. Sometimes, the structure of a college essay rubric may correspond to the parts of the essay itself, e.g., the title, the first and the second paragraphs, etc.
SAT essay rubric vs. college essay rubric: understand the difference
An essay is a substantial part of SAT, a test every school student has to pass. It has been created in order to check the students’ ability to express their thoughts, their capability of accepting complex ideas, as well as their language use and writing talents.
Also, there are certain peculiarities concerning AP essay rubric. This type of essay is written by high-school students taking courses of the Advanced Placement program that provides the curriculum of college level to the high school students. Not only it has to indicate the knowledge in the subject, but the fluency of language is also assessed.
The other known type of an essay is a 5-paragraph essay that has an introduction, 3 paragraphs developing the idea, and the conclusion. It may be devoted to different issues; thus, the 5 paragraph essay rubric reviews every part of the work. The readers will pay attention to the transitions you made between the paragraphs, the clarity of thoughts expressed etc.
An appraisal on the basis of an expository essay rubric usually deals with your ability to explain, which is different from persuasion. Was your thesis clear? Did you give enough examples? Was the essay interesting in general? The scoring will likely be based on those factors. The rubric for persuasive essay may slightly differ. Can you actually present the concept in a convincing way? That’s what matters in this case.
Comparison as a fresh view on the problem
Sometimes the students are asked to write a compare or contrast essay. They have to offer a comparison between two notions or periods, etc. For example, they need to confront social life in Russia at the beginning of the 19th century and in the mid-1850ies. In this case, the compare or contrast essay rubric will concentrate on their ability to present the picture of that historical period, the sufficient number of examples and details, the right factors of comparison, etc.
ToK, extended, thematic essays
The Theory of Knowledge (ToK) essays are written during the theory of knowledge exams at the end of the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme. The author chooses one of six offered titles and has to come to certain conclusions on them at the end of the essay. Just like a five paragraph essay rubric, a ToK essay rubric pays attention to the quality of logical connections between facts and the analysis of the topic.
Sweeping study – extended essay
Also, you may be given the assignment to write an extended essay. It requires a long and proficient work which has to result in about 4000 words. The International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme (IB) recommends spending 40 hours on the work; 4 of them have to be spent with your tutor. The volume of the extended essay rubric is large, as well. It appraises it all – from your introduction to the analytical achievements to the quality of conclusions.
Thematic essays: writing them appropriately
A thematic essay is another kind of an essay. It is focused on one relatively narrow topic. So, a thematic essay rubric usually contains such criteria as the number of examples and facts, understanding of the topic, unique yet right introduction and a conclusion that need to be more than restating the general idea, etc.
In any genre of essays, remember to be persuasive. Essay rubric, high school teacher or university tutor are there to help you submit a decent work.
Need more info on essay rubrics? Visit //samedayessay.com at any time, day or night.