Comparison Between Democracy And Dictatorship Essay

Democracy versus Dictatorship



Democracy versus Dictatorship :




In theory, democracy is the best form of government. It is the government of the people as distinguished from the government of an individual or of a class of people. It makes all the citizens interested in their country by giving them a voice in legislation. It gives them a feeling of importance and a sense of responsibility. It thus gives a meaning to their personality. Another merit of democracy is that it is less liable to revolution than other forms of government. Since people themselves elect the members of government the need of a revolution does not arise. In additions to this, a democratic government usually guarantees freedom of thought and speech. This twofold freedom is a very great advantage as it enables the individual to grow freely. Democracy thus offers the most favorable atmosphere for the development of the human personality.


Democracy literally means the rule of the people. It has been defined as government of the people, by the people for the people. Modern democracy rests on the principle of representation. The people elect their representatives by vote. These representatives attend the legislature and act on behalf other citizens. If the citizens are not satisfied with their representatives, they may not re-elect them in the next elections.


But democracy has its danger. The greatest of which is that it may be the rule of ignorance. “Nine peoel out of every ten", says Carlyle, “are fools" and citizens who are not sufficiently intelligent or educated are likely to commit errors of judgment in the casting of votes. The best men may this fail to get elected. Elections are usually matters of propaganda. However, the voters in countries like Britain and America have not proved so lacking in judgment as many of the opponents of democracy would have us believe, though it is true that our own country the people, being illiterate, rarely give evidence of sound or independent judgment. Another critic of democracy is that it is wanting in efficiency. For prompt and effective actions, unity of action is essential.


“One bad general", said Napoleon “is better than two good ones". In a multitude of minds, much unprofitable discussion takes place, whereas unity of control is needed for a vigorous national life. According to Newman, for example, the British government cannot cope with the emergencies created by war as effectively as a dictator can. This criticism, however, is not very convincing because in times of war the British prime minter usually wields the powers of a dictator. During world wars, for examples, Sir Winston Churchill faced few real difficulties as a result of the system of democracy in England. A sounder criticism of democracy in times of war would be to say that secrecy in military affairs becomes difficult, if not impossible, and that the oppositions usably lowers the morale of people by its loud condemnations of the actions of the Cabinet.


It was thought that the two world wars had made the world safe for democracy, but this forecast proved to be wrong. While democracy worked quite well in France and the English speaking countries, most other countries swung towards dictatorship. So successful and powerful did their dictatorships become, that the days of democracy seemed to be almost over.


Unfortunately, theemthods of scitatorhsip are, and have to be, ruthless. Dictatorship employed force and violence OT maintain itself. It resorts to physical compulsion, person, concentrations camps censored, intimidation purges and execution. Both n Russia and Germany countless execution was ordered for the sanity of dsicitsorhsip. A dictatorship cannot brook slightest oppositions.


Dictatorship is certainly not without its merits. As carryall poitnsour, society is anorgnaism. And not a machine. Now mechanical sytemliek the ballot-box can, therefore, prove satisfactory. The safer course is OT gives all power to a dictator. The dictator must, of course, be once who has exception amity to organize, direct and admitter. Parliamtary rule usably means gomer by clues ofpoliticans whose purviews dictator on the other hand, can concentrate all his emerges towards theupliftment and improvement of his country.


Thus, there can be no freedom of thought or speech under such asstm. Intesivece propaganda is employed, as was den s germy, to retain the sport of the people. Dictatorship, therefore by its very nature hampers the free devleoepmtn of the human personality. It does not awe for divest of political option and belief, but tends towards political regimentations or standardizations of human beings. The greatest danger of dictatorship, however, is its partiality for war as an instrument of national aggrandizement. Practically very dictate preaches war, partly because he is actuated by person amnion and partly because he suffers from an exaggerated anaionslism.





From
Democracy versus Dictatorship
To HOME PAGE



Democracy vs Dictatorship

Democracy and dictatorship show difference between them in terms of their methodology and concept. First of all, what is democracy and what is dictatorship? Democracy and dictatorship are two types of rule over a country. The person, who has complete power over a country, is called a dictator. A dictator enjoys an absolute rule over a country or a state. On the other hand, in a democracy, the choice to create laws is with the people. In other words, we can say a democracy is taking decisions by discussing it with all. That means people have the say in deciding what to do.

What is Dictatorship?

In a dictatorship, one person that is one political figure has the absolute power to control everything in the country without anyone’s interference. As a result, a dictatorship consists of someone else choosing what is good for the people. Dictatorship frames the laws that govern the rights of the people and the economy as well. It also outlines the laws that govern the private property as well. Personal freedom and liberties have to be completely sacrificed in dictatorship. So, if you are unhappy over something, then you should continue to be unhappy over it all your life. It is because usually telling you opinion is not tolerated in a dictatorship.

Adolf Hitler

It is often felt that dictatorship is efficient in framing new laws to dominate certain sections. You should remember that this framing new law to dominate certain sections is not done with best intentions all the time. For example, think about all the Jews that lost their lives during Hitler’s rule. There is always the probability of innocent people getting convicted often due to lack of proper cross examination in the case of dictatorship. The accused cannot confront the witness in the case of dictatorship. However, the time taken to implement a decision is fairly fast in the case of dictatorship.

What is Democracy?

Unlike a dictatorship, self indulgence is the keyword in democracy. People would choose what is best for them. Democracy does not consist of someone else choosing what is good for the people. That means the power to create laws lies with the people in democracy. As a result, if you are unhappy over something in a democracy there is always a chance to change it and set it right so that it can make you happy, finally.

In democracy, there is no place for creating new laws to dominate certain sections or people or to oppress certain groups of people. Moreover, there is always respect for personal freedom and personal liberties in democracy. In fact, it can be said that democracy encourages and safeguards freedom of expression and freedom of speech and extends them to every single person of the nation. Then, justice is done to perfection in a democracy. The accused is provided with an opportunity to confront the witness in the case of democracy. Nevertheless, the process of implementing a decision is slow in the case of democracy.

What is the difference between Democracy and Dictatorship?

• In a dictatorship, one ruler has an absolute power to rule over a country or a state. But, in democracy, it is the rule of the people.

• In dictatorship, framing new laws is in the hands of the dictators. On the other hand, in a democracy, the choice to create laws is with the people.

• Rules are not created over sections of the society in a democracy. It is a possibility in a dictatorship.

• The time taken to implement a decision is fairly fast in the case of dictatorship whereas the process of implementing a decision is slow in the case of democracy.

• Personal freedom and personal liabilities are sacrificed in a dictatorship. That is not the case in a democracy. People have freedom to say what they want. This is another important difference between democracy and dictatorship.

• Justice is protected in a democracy as the accused gets an equal chance to present his or her case. Such opportunity is not given in a dictatorship.

 

Images Courtesy:

  1. Adolf Hitler by German Federal Archive (CC BY-SA 3.0 de)
Loading...
Cite This Page
"Difference Between Democracy and Dictatorship." DifferenceBetween.Com. February 12, 2011. < http://www.differencebetween.com/difference-between-democracy-and-vs-dictatorship/ >

Filed Under: GovernmentTagged With: Democracy, democracy and dictatorship, Democracy Definition, dictator, Dictatorship, dictatorship definition

One thought on “Comparison Between Democracy And Dictatorship Essay

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *